Validation and Evidence in Threat Modelling
A threat model is only operationally valid when:
- it has been explicitly validated;
- it has an identified person responsible for it;
- it produces verifiable evidence.
Without these elements, Threat Modelling remains an exploratory activity, not a security control.
1. Mandatory human validation
Every threat model must be:
- critically reviewed;
- approved by an explicit role (e.g. Tech Lead, Security Architect).
Tools, methods or analytical aids do not replace this decision.
2. Minimum acceptance criteria
A Threat Model is considered accepted when, at a minimum:
- the system context is clearly defined;
- the analysed architecture is identified and versioned;
- the main threats have been identified and classified;
- each threat has an associated decision:
- mitigated,
- accepted,
- transferred,
- or rejected with justification.
3. Minimum mandatory evidence
The evidence associated with a Threat Model must include, at a minimum:
- versioned architectural diagram(s);
- a list of threats with an explicit decision;
- a clear link to security requirements or mitigations;
- identification of the person responsible for validation;
- date and version of the model.
The evidence must be:
- reproducible;
- auditable;
- preserved in accordance with the organisation's policies.
4. Distinction between support and decision
It is mandatory to distinguish explicitly between:
- artefacts that support the analysis;
- the validated threat model.
Only the latter constitutes the basis for:
- defining requirements;
- risk acceptance;
- auditing.
5. Review and invalidation
A threat model must be reviewed whenever there is:
- a significant change to the architecture;
- the introduction of new dependencies;
- a relevant change in the data flow;
- a reclassification of the risk level (L1–L3).
Models that have not been reviewed must be considered potentially invalid.
6. Integration with other chapters
Validated Threat Modelling constitutes:
- direct input to Chapter 02 - Security Requirements;
- the basis of justification for architectural decisions;
- evidence of application proportional to the risk defined in Chapter 01.